James A. Paton - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

          effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the            
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                  
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's 1997                
          Federal income tax in the amount of $2,702.  As explained below,            
          petitioner does not dispute the deficiency but contends that he             
          is not liable for interest thereon.                                         
               Some of the facts in this case have been stipulated and are            
          so found.  Petitioner resided in Boulder, Colorado, at the time             
          he filed his petition.                                                      
               The parties stipulated that petitioner received net taxable            
          Social Security benefits of $11,121 in 1997 and that he did not             
          report the Social Security benefits on his 1997 tax return.                 
          Petitioner does not contest the amount of the taxes owed but                
          believes he should not have to pay any interest because he                  
          alleges the Government did not send him a Form 1099-SSA setting             
          forth the amount of his taxable benefits.                                   
               Social Security benefits are taxable to the extent provided            
          under section 86.  We note that taxable income must be reported             
          regardless of whether a Form 1099 is received.  Moreover, this              
          Court does not have jurisdiction to redetermine interest prior to           
          the entry of a decision redetermining the deficiency.  Sec.                 
          7481(c); Rule 261; Pen Coal Corp. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. 249             
          (1996).  Because petitioner does not contest the amount of the              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011