Jaime Pena and Verna Ann Pena - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         

          address respondent’s determination that the IRA distributions are           
          includable in their 1996 income.  Consequently, we consider                 
          petitioners to have conceded the correctness of that                        
          determination.  Moreover, based upon the evidence presented, we             
          are satisfied that petitioners’ deemed concession is consistent             
          with controlling law.2  The IRA distributions are includable in             
          petitioners’ 1996 income, and respondent’s determination in this            
          regard is sustained.                                                        
               Because respondent has not challenged any of the deductions            
          taken on petitioners’ 1996 return, we need not discuss the merits           
          of petitioners’ claim that respondent erred by disallowing the              
          deduction for the plan’s “investment losses” taken on that                  
          return.                                                                     






               2 Distributions from an IRA are includable in the                      
          taxpayer’s/distributee’s income in accordance with sec. 72.                 
          See sec. 408(d).  The IRA distributions were not received as an             
          annuity by petitioner.  Consequently, the distributions are                 
          includable in petitioners’ income, except to the extent that any            
          distribution, or any portion of any distribution, is allocable to           
          petitioners’ “investment in the contract.”  Sec. 72(e)(2).                  
               Petitioners do not claim that petitioner made nondeductible            
          contributions to the IRA.  Consequently, we proceed as though his           
          tax basis in the IRA were zero.  Nor do petitioners claim, and              
          nothing in the record suggests, that petitioners should otherwise           
          be given credit for any investment in the IRA, within the meaning           
          of sec. 72(e)(3)(A)(ii) and 72(e)(6).  Consequently, the entire             
          amount of the distribution is allocated to, and must be included            
          in, petitioner's income.  See sec. 72(e)(3)(A).                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011