Francis Lawrence and Kathryn Tenopir Remkiewicz - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          protecting his employment reputation and to make sure that the              
          termination of his employment did not jeopardize his potential              
          for future employment.  The attorney attended the school board              
          meeting at which petitioner’s performance, evaluation, and the              
          intent not to reemploy him were the subject matter.  In                     
          particular, petitioner sought to have the attorney attempt to               
          limit any damaging information that might be available in                   
          connection with his past employment with the Lynwood School                 
          District.                                                                   
               After representing petitioner at the board meeting,                    
          petitioner’s attorney explained that the most effective approach            
          for reaching their objectives would be to bring a discrimination            
          action under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.           
          secs. 2000a to 2000b-2.1  Petitioner’s complaint was filed on               
          October 12, 1995, in the United States District Court, Central              
          District of California alleging racial discrimination against him           
          by the Lynwood School District and its trustees.  Petitioner                
          obtained a position at the Oakdale School District where the                
          superintendent knew of his termination from the prior school                
          district.  It was understood that the continuation of                       
          petitioner’s position with the Oakdale District depended on his             
          success in the final resolution of petitioner’s litigation                  


               1 As amended in 1991, see United States v. Burke, 504 U.S.             
          229, 241 n.12 (1992).                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011