Oliver K. Robinson and Deborah L. Robinson, et al. - Page 22




                                       - 22 -                                         
         relationship, has the status of an employee.  Sec. 3121(d)(1) and            
         (2).  Applicable regulations concerning corporate officers                   
         provide:                                                                     
              Generally, an officer of a corporation is an employee                   
              of the corporation.  However, an officer of a                           
              corporation who as such does not perform any services                   
              or performs only minor services and who neither                         
              receives nor is entitled to receive, directly or                        
              indirectly, any remuneration is considered not to be an                 
              employee of the corporation.  * * *  [Sec. 31.3121(d)-                  
              1(b), Employment Tax Regs.]                                             
                                                                                     
              An officer who receives remuneration for substantial                    
         services rendered to the corporation is considered an employee               
         within the meaning of section 3121(d).  Van Camp & Bennion v.                
         United States, 251 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. 2001); Spicer Accounting,              
         Inc. v. United States, 918 F.2d 90, 93 (9th Cir. 1990).  With                
         regard to the remuneration, it may be received directly or                   
         indirectly, but the relevant factor is whether the payments are              
         received for services rendered.  Spicer Accounting, Inc. v.                  
         United States, supra at 93; Automated Typesetting, Inc. v. United            
         States, 527 F. Supp. 515, 522 (E.D. Wis. 1981).                              
              Respondent argues that the Robinsons treated themselves as              
         self-employed by virtue of the following factors:  (1) They were             
         not paid and did not report wages or other compensation from the             
         corporation; (2) Mr. Robinson reported self-employment income                
         from management services on a Schedule C, Profit or Loss From                
         Business, in 1992 which respondent attributes to his work for                
         Career; (3) the Robinsons managed the day-to-day operations and              





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011