Nicholas M. Romer - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
          the year that the property is placed in service.  The allowance             
          is limited to $10,000, reduced (but not below zero) by the amount           
          by which the cost of the section 179 property placed in service             
          exceeds $200,000.  See section 179(b).  Thus, the allowance is              
          zero if the cost of the section 179 property exceeds $210,000.              
          Because petitioner purchased the King Air in 1991 for $225,000,             
          no section 179 allowance is available.10                                    
              3.  Parts and Repairs                                                  
               For taxable year 1989, petitioner seeks deductions totaling            
          $941 for unagreed expenses allegedly incurred for various parts             
          and repairs required for his aircraft.  Respondent generally                
          contends that petitioner has failed to substantiate the business            
          purpose for each expenditure.11                                             
               On the basis of our review of the documentary evidence in              
          the record, we find that petitioner has adequately substantiated            
          an expenditure of $808 for an aircraft part.  He has failed,                
          however, adequately to substantiate business purpose for the                
          remaining unagreed expenses at issue, which include numerous                
          small payments allegedly made to auto parts stores, a hardware              




               10 It also appears that petitioner made no proper election             
          for the sec. 179 allowance.  See sec. 179(c).  Given our holding            
          that petitioner is not entitled to any sec. 179 allowance,                  
          however, we need not address this issue.                                    
               11 Respondent does not contend that any of petitioner’s                
          alleged expenditures for parts should have been capitalized under           
          sec. 263.  Accordingly, we do not reach this issue.                         




Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011