Thomas E. & Dorothy J. Ross - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' 1997                
          Federal income tax in the amount of $10,257.  This Court must               
          decide whether petitioners are liable for the alternative minimum           
          tax (AMT) under section 55.  Petitioners do not dispute the                 
          computation of the AMT.                                                     
               Some of the facts in this case have been stipulated and are            
          so found.  Petitioners resided in Evergreen, Colorado, at the               
          time they filed their petition.                                             
               Dorothy Ross (Mrs. Ross) was the beneficiary of two trusts             
          during the year at issue.  The trusts invested only in one mutual           
          fund and did not invest in rental property or engage in the                 
          operation of a trade or business.  A legal dispute arose with               
          respect to the beneficiaries of the trusts and the trustee bank             
          regarding the trustee bank's management of the trusts.  In                  
          connection with the legal dispute, petitioners personally                   
          incurred and paid legal and accounting fees totaling $63,247 in             
          1997.  Petitioners reported $63 of interest income and $33,370 of           
          dividend income from the trust in 1997.  Petitioners deducted the           
          legal and accounting fees on Schedule A - Itemized Deductions               
          under line 22 "Other expenses".  Petitioners did not file Form              
          6251, Alternative Minimum Tax - Individuals, with their 1997                
          return.                                                                     
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for the              
          AMT in the amount of $10,257.  Petitioners contend that they                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011