- 7 - 1, 844; S. Rept. 99-313, at 208 (1986), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 3) 1, 208. Petitioner does not dispute the amount of his 1993 tax liability as of July 10, 1997, and agrees that the June 12, 1997, levy was appropriate and resolved petitioner’s tax liability for 1993. Petitioner has not alleged that respondent assessed additional interest after July 10, 1997, with respect to petitioner’s 1993 taxable year. Rather, petitioner’s dispute concerns his claims that his property was levied upon twice for 1993 and that application of the July 20, 1997, levy proceeds to his 1994 tax liability was erroneous because he did not receive notice of respondent’s intent to levy for the 1994 year. Respondent did not cause any delay in the payment of petitioner’s 1993 tax liability. Petitioner has not alleged any error on the part of respondent prior to July 10, 1997, the date on which his 1993 tax liability was resolved. Although it appears that respondent mistakenly levied on petitioner’s property twice for his 1993 tax liability,8 respondent promptly 8Petitioner alleges that respondent wrongfully levied on petitioner’s property because notice of intent to levy was not provided for the 1994 year. The evidence before us indicates that respondent levied on petitioner’s property twice for petitioner’s 1993 tax liability, but that proceeds from the second levy were used to satisfy petitioner’s undisputed tax liabilities for subsequent years. Petitioner brought this action under sec. 6404 seeking review of respondent’s failure to abate interest. In the instant case, we lack jurisdiction to decide petitioner’s claim that respondent made a wrongful levy. See sec. 6404(i); Krugman v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 230, 236 (1999).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011