Samuel T. Seawright and Carol A. Seawright - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
               Section 7602(c) is effective for contacts made after the               
          180th day after the July 22, 1998, enactment of RRA 1998 (i.e.,             
          after January 18, 1999).  See RRA 1998 sec. 3417(b), 112 Stat.              
          758.                                                                        
               Alleged Third-Party Contacts During the Examination                    
               On brief, petitioners allege that during the initial                   
          July 16, 1998, meeting, Leary told Carol that she had previously            
          contacted petitioners’ bank and that Leary subsequently asked               
          Carol why petitioners changed banks so often.  Petitioners allege           
          that this line of inquiry “shows that she [Leary] had extensive             
          third party contacts”.  Petitioners allege that they told Leary             
          that they wanted to be notified whenever a third party was                  
          contacted, but they never received any third-party contact                  
          information from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).                        
               Section 7602(c) has no application to any third-party                  
          contacts that might have been made by respondent’s agents before            
          the January 19, 1999, effective date.  The evidence does not show           
          that Leary or any other of respondent’s agents made any third-              
          party contacts after January 18, 1999, in the course of the                 
          examination that culminated in the January 6, 2000, issuance of             
          the notice of deficiency.                                                   
               Alleged Third-Party Contacts During Trial Preparation                  
               On brief, petitioners allege that shortly before the October           
          2000 trial date, respondent’s agents contacted various third                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011