Service Engineering Trust - Page 3




                                         -3-                                          
          representative called the Appeals officer.  Petitioners’                    
          representative stated that he did not participate in the                    
          scheduled hearing because he had not received responses to the              
          interrogatories.  On February 3, 2000, respondent issued Notices            
          of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section              
          6320 and/or 6330, determining that his proposed collection                  
          actions were to be sustained.  At trial, on January 8, 2001,                
          respondent moved for the imposition of a section 6673(a)(1)                 
          penalty.                                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               Section 6320(b)(1) provides that if a taxpayer requests a              
          hearing, “such hearing shall be held by the Internal Revenue                
          Service Office of Appeals.”  Section 6320(c) provides that                  
          section 6330 shall apply to the conduct and judicial review of              
          the hearing.  Section 6330(c)(2)(B) allows challenges to the                
          existence or amount of the underlying liability only if the                 
          taxpayer did not receive a notice of deficiency or have an                  
          opportunity to dispute the liability.                                       
               Section 6330(d) provides for Tax Court review of the                   
          Commissioner’s administrative determination.  Where the validity            
          of the underlying liability is properly at issue, the Court will            
          review the matter de novo.  Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35,             
          39 (2000).  In cases where the validity of the liability is not             
          properly part of the appeal, the Court reviews the Commissioner’s           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011