Rosiland J. Smith - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         

               However, petitioner has failed to recognize that the cases             
          in which the common law mailbox rule is applied are generally               
          those where the return was never received by the IRS, not those             
          where the return was received after its due date bearing a                  
          legible but untimely postmark.  See Anderson v. United States,              
          supra; Estate of Wood v. Commissioner, supra.  "When a legible              
          postmark appears on an envelope no evidence that the petition was           
          mailed on some other day will be allowed."  Shipley v.                      
          Commissioner, 572 F.2d 212, 214 (9th Cir. 1977), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1976-383.  Petitioner offered no explanation why the envelope was           
          postmarked and received almost exactly 1 year after it was                  
          allegedly mailed.  We find that the return was mailed after the             
          due date on April 18, 1997, the date the envelope was postmarked.           
               When a return is mailed after the due date, the return is              
          considered filed on the date the return is actually received by             
          the IRS.  Emmons v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 342, 346-347 (1989),              
          affd. 898 F.2d 50 (5th Cir. 1990); Radding v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1988-250.                                                             
               Petitioner’s return was received by the IRS at some point              
          between April 18, 1997, and April 26, 1997.  Because there was              
          some question as to the exact date the return was received, the             
          IRS used the earliest date of April 18, 1997, as the received               
          date.  We shall do the same.  Therefore, we find that                       
          petitioner’s return was received on April 18, 1997, and was filed           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011