- 14 -
assets were paid over to Ms. Hodson’s attorney, or were used by
that attorney to make $2,500 payments to or on behalf of Ms.
Hodson or Meagan. Petitioner has failed to prove that, during
1994, he made any of the monthly payments required by the
September 8, 1994, order.
In addition to claiming that he made the monthly payments
required by the September 8, 1994, order, petitioner claims that
the State Court, in the July 1, 1994, order, ordered him to pay
alimony, which, indeed, he did pay. By the July 1, 1994, order,
the State Court lifted the freeze it had imposed on certain
assets (which it described as “the parties’ assets”). It ordered
certain sums from those assets paid to Ms. Hodson. Among those
assets was an account with the MacDill Federal Credit Union,
which the Court found to have an approximate balance of
$2,166.15. It also ordered:
[T]he Wife is to receive from the Husband’s non-marital
assets and his share of marital assets, the approximate
sum of $5,205.00, which sum shall be comprised of the
following approximate amounts:
(a) $900.00 – Husband’s share of U.S. Savings
Bonds which are marital property;
(b) $1,800 – Husband’s separate U.S. Savings
Bonds;
(c) $600 – Husband’s one-half (1/2) 1993 IRS tax
refund;
(d) $250.00 – Husband’s one-half (1/2) of
returned bail money.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011