Larry Dean Sykes and Ruby Sykes - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
               (a)  Has complied with substantiation requirements under the           
          Internal Revenue Code.  See sec. 7491(a)(2)(A).  Respondent                 
          concedes that petitioners meet this requirement;                            
               (b)  has maintained all records required by the Internal               
          Revenue Code and has cooperated with reasonable requests by the             
          Secretary for information, documents, meetings, etc.  See sec.              
          7491(a)(2)(B).  Respondent concedes that petitioners meet this              
          requirement;                                                                
               (c)  introduces, in a court proceeding, credible evidence              
          with respect to any factual issue relevant to ascertaining the              
          liability of the taxpayer for any tax imposed under subtitle A or           
          B.  See sec. 7491(a)(1).  Respondent disputes whether petitioners           
          meet this requirement.                                                      
               In its report for the RRA 1998, the Senate Finance Committee           
          explained the burden of proof provision as follows:                         
                    The burden will shift to the Secretary under this                 
               provision only if the taxpayer first introduces                        
               credible evidence with respect to a factual issue                      
               relevant to ascertaining the taxpayer's income tax                     
               liability.  Credible evidence is the quality of                        
               evidence which, after critical analysis, the court                     
               would find sufficient upon which to base a decision on                 
               the issue if no contrary evidence were submitted                       
               (without regard to the judicial presumption of IRS                     
               correctness).  A taxpayer has not produced credible                    
               evidence for these purposes if the taxpayer merely                     
               makes implausible factual assertions, frivolous claims,                
               or tax protestor-type arguments.  The introduction of                  
               evidence will not meet this standard if the court is                   
               not convinced that it is worthy of belief.  If after                   
               evidence from both sides, the court believes that the                  







Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011