Edward C. Tietig - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
                    1.   Timing                                                       
               Petitioner offers two arguments why gain from the sale                 
          should not be recognized in 1990.  First, petitioner asserts that           
          the Kiddies 38/91 partnership’s $174,900 payment to Farm & Grove            
          for the 53 lots was contingent upon County Bank’s reducing                  
          petitioner’s debt to the bank by $174,900 or $3,300 per lot.                
          According to petitioner, when County Bank refused to transfer the           
          debt obligation to the partnership, payment was treated as a                
          contingent sale from resales starting in 1991.  We find no such             
          language in the sales agreement.                                            
               Consideration for the transfer consisted of $174,900 ($3,300           
          per lot) through the assumption of debt,19 plus $1,374 per lot to           
          be paid upon the sale and/or hypothecation of the existing                  
          mortgage on those lots.  Nothing in the agreement indicates that            
          the transfer was contingent upon County Bank’s reducing                     
          petitioner’s debt by $174,900.  Rather, the agreement explicitly            
          provides that consideration for the transaction was to be paid by           
          the partnership to petitioner and Farm & Grove.  The attached               
          Mortgage Deed and note, while not executed, provides further                
          evidence that the agreement was not contingent upon County Bank’s           
          reducing petitioner’s debt by $174,900.  Farm & Grove and                   
          petitioner were named as parties on the Mortgage Deed and on the            



               19This amount is the same amount that was required to                  
          release a lot from the County Bank mortgage lien.                           





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011