- 34 -                                         
          individual would not have been favorable.  See Wichita Terminal             
          Elevator Co. v. Commissioner, 6 T.C. at 1165.                               
               We sustain respondent’s determination that petitioner’s                
          long-term capital loss on the Eureka Field Nursery Stock is $186            
          in 1991.                                                                    
                    2.  Short-Term Capital Loss                                       
               Respondent determined that petitioner incurred a bad debt              
          loss in 1991 of $22,714 due to unpaid shareholder loans by Eureka           
          Field Nursery when it ceased operations in 1991.  On brief,                 
          respondent argues that petitioner’s loss is $33,003.36                      
               In his petition, petitioner asserted that respondent erred             
          in determining the amount of nonbusiness bad debt in 1991, but he           
          makes no arguments in his brief regarding this issue.  Petitioner           
          asserts in his reply brief that respondent concedes the amount              
          stated, $22,714, but that the true amount in dispute is $60,36837           
          as set forth in “Petitioner’s Recap, Exhibit 1 hereto.”  However,           
               36The amount of the loss is based on a $55,567 outstanding             
          shareholder loan reported on Schedule L of Eureka’s 1990 income             
          tax return with two modifications:  An increase of $4,800 in 1990           
          and a decrease of $27,365 in 1991.                                          
               Petitioner does not dispute the $4,800 increase in                     
          shareholder loans to $60,367 in 1990, and the $27,365 decrease in           
          shareholder loans in 1991 was stipulated by the parties.  Thus,             
          the total loss is $33,003 ($55,567 + $4,800 = $60,367 - $27,365 =           
          $33,002.  We note a $1 difference.).                                        
               37Apparently, petitioner neglected to reduce the total loan            
          amount due of $60,367 by the stipulated loan repayments totaling            
          $27,365.  See supra note 36.                                                
Page:  Previous   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011