- 2 - After concessions, the issues for decision are: (1) Whether, pursuant to section 162(a), petitioners are entitled to deductions in the amounts claimed for unreimbursed employment expenses; (2) whether, pursuant to section 212, petitioners are entitled to deductions in the amounts claimed for investment expenses; (3) whether, pursuant to section 170, petitioners are entitled to deductions in the amounts claimed for charitable contributions; (4) whether, pursuant to section 212, petitioners are entitled to a deduction in the amount claimed for expenses attributable to real property held for the production of income; (5) whether, pursuant to section 280A(c)(1), petitioners are entitled to deductions for expenses attributable to an office in the home; and (6) whether, pursuant to section 6662(a), petitioners are liable for penalties due to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulated facts are incorporated in our findings by this reference. At the time of the filing of the petition, petitioners resided in Elmhurst, Illinois. Aziz A. Tokh (petitioner) is an architect at Northeast Illinois Railroad Corporation (NIRC), andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011