George Vajda - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         

          Mr. Salmon, on the other hand, applied the cost factors for the             
          eastern region of the United States, which were greater than the            
          Newark cost factors.  Mr. Salmon’s application of the greater               
          cost factors obviously resulted in his greater cost estimate.  We           
          believe that Mr. Salmon’s application of the greater cost factors           
          was wrong.                                                                  
               We conclude that petitioner has failed to disprove                     
          respondent’s determination that the depreciable basis of the                
          buildings at the start of the subject years was less than the               
          $390,014 of depreciation taken as of that date.  We sustain                 
          respondent's determination on this issue.                                   
          2. $250,000 Loan                                                            
               We must determine whether petitioner has sufficient tax                
          basis in his Calvary stock to allow him to deduct the passthrough           
          losses.  A shareholder of an S corporation may utilize the losses           
          from an S corporation only to a limited extent.  The losses may             
          not exceed the sum of the adjusted basis of the shareholder’s               
          stock in the S corporation plus his or her adjusted basis of any            
          indebtedness of the S corporation to the shareholder.  See sec.             
          1366(d)(1).                                                                 
               Petitioner again relies on his testimony to support his                
          assertion that the $250,000 loan from Fleet enters into this                
          computation.  In contrast with petitioner’s testimony on the                
          first issue, we find petitioner’s testimony on this issue is                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011