- 7 - “appropriate” or “helpful” in the development of the taxpayer's business. Welch v. Helvering, supra. Unless expressly provided for, section 262 prohibits deductions for personal, living, or family expenses. The basis of respondent’s determination that the expenses at issue are not ordinary and necessary appears to be that the expenses were personal in nature and not related to petitioner’s business of selling generators. Based on petitioner’s explanations at trial, we are satisfied that the following expenses are ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in petitioners’ business: Advertising $94 Car & truck expenses 256 Depreciation 1,600 Office expenses 103 Rent 12,600 Utilities 2,755 Other 724 Total 18,132 We found credible petitioner’s testimony that the San Jose property was used for business purposes and not as their personal residence despite the fact that petitioners rented the property under a residential lease that provides that the property is to be “used only as a private residence”. With respect to the expenses related to petitioners’ truck (depreciation, car & truck, and $524 of “other” expense), petitioner testified that he and his wife used the truck to transport solar panels, toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011