Richard D. Waters - Page 10




                                        - 9 -                                         

          issue 70 F.3d 34 (5th Cir. 1995).                                           
               Section 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs., provides that "The               
          term 'damages received (whether by suit or agreement)' means an             
          amount received * * * through prosecution of a legal suit or                
          action based upon tort or tort type rights, or through a                    
          settlement agreement entered into in lieu of such prosecution."             
          Thus, in order to exclude damages from gross income pursuant to             
          section 104(a)(2), the taxpayer must prove:  (1) The underlying             
          cause of action is "based upon tort or tort type rights", and (2)           
          the damages were received "on account of personal injuries or               
          sickness".  Commissioner v. Schleier, supra at 336-337.                     
               Where amounts are received pursuant to a settlement                    
          agreement, the nature of the claim that was the actual basis for            
          settlement controls whether such amounts are excludable from                
          gross income under section 104(a)(2).  See United States v.                 
          Burke, 504 U.S. 229, 237 (1992).  The crucial question is "in               
          lieu of what was the settlement amount paid."  Bagley v.                    
          Commissioner, 105 T.C. 396, 406 (1995), affd. 121 F.3d 393 (8th             
          Cir. 1997). Determining the nature of the claim is a factual                
          inquiry.  See Robinson v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 116, 127 (1994),           
          affd. in part, revd. in part, and remanded 70 F.3d 34 (5th Cir.             
          1995).                                                                      
               Here, the complaint in the class action was exclusively for            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011