Ida Mae Whittaker - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          husband’s former employer’s retirement plan.1  Petitioner’s                 
          position is that she should not be subject to income tax on the             
          payments in question because her deceased husband’s Social                  
          Security number (SSN), rather than her own, is listed on various            
          documents concerning the payments that she periodically received            
          from his former employer’s retirement plan.                                 
               No written stipulation of fact was filed in this case.  An             
          oral stipulation of fact was made at trial.  The oral stipulation           
          of fact and the referenced exhibits identified in that                      
          stipulation are incorporated herein by this reference.                      
          Petitioner resided in Tacoma, Washington, on the date the                   
          petition was filed.                                                         
               Petitioner was married to Denorise Whittaker (Mr. Whittaker)           
          until his death on October 4, 1995.  Approximately 4 months                 
          before his death, Mr. Whittaker retired from the Boeing Co.                 
          (Boeing) effective June 1, 1995.  As an employee of Boeing, Mr.             
          Whittaker participated in the Boeing Employee Retirement Plan               
          (plan).  When he retired, Mr. Whittaker elected a 75-percent                
          joint and surviving spouse option, naming petitioner as his joint           
          annuitant under the plan.  After Mr. Whittaker’s death,                     
          petitioner became entitled to receive from the plan a benefit of            
          $815.13 per month for the remainder of her life.  Pursuant to the           


               1 Petitioner claimed an earned income credit on her 1998 tax           
          return.  Her eligibility for the credit is a computational                  
          matter.                                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011