- 4 - block checked on the Schedule C indicating that the cash method of accounting was used to compute the items of income and deductions reported thereon, argues that petitioners’ 1994 deduction for supplies is limited to the amount paid for such expenses by the close of that year. Petitioners, however, claim that, for 1994, petitioner’s business was on the accrual method of accounting, under which the deduction for supplies would be allowed as claimed on their 1994 return. See sec. 1.446- 1(c)(1)(ii), Income Tax Regs. We disagree with petitioners’ claim that petitioner’s business was on the accrual method of accounting for 1994. The claim is inconsistent with the express representation made on the Schedule C and inconsistent with petitioner’s testimony that his “checkbook was * * * [his] bookkeeper”. Furthermore, there is nothing in the record that suggests that other deductions were computed on the accrual method of accounting, and it is clear that the income reported on the Schedule C was not. “[A] taxpayer who uses the cash method of accounting in computing gross income from his trade or business shall use the cash method in computing expenses of such trade or business.” Sec. 1.446- 1(c)(1)(iv)(a), Income Tax Regs. In accordance with the cash method of accounting, petitioners are entitled to a deduction for supplies only to the extent that such expenses were paid during 1994. Respondent’sPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011