- 4 - (b) The appeals officer failed to furnish requested documentation prior to the hearing and failed to properly schedule and notify the petitioners of the time and date of the hearing that petitioners requested. (c) These failures resulted in the Petitioner’s and their authorized representative’s inability to be present and present their case, examine documents or cross examine witnesses against them. We have assumed that the intended reference in the petition is a reference to section 301.6330-1T(e)(1), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 64 Fed. Reg. 3411 (Jan. 22, 1999),2 which provides: (e) Matters considered at CDP hearing (1) In general. Appeals has the authority to determine the validity, sufficiency, and timeliness of any CDP [collection due process] Notice given by the IRS and of any request for a CDP hearing that is made by a taxpayer. Prior to issuance of a determination, the hearing officer is required to obtain verification from the IRS office collecting the tax that the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure have been met. The taxpayer may raise any relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax at the hearing, including appropriate spousal defenses, challenges to the appropriateness of the proposed collection action, and offers of collection alternatives. The taxpayer also may raise challenges to the existence or amount of the tax liability for any tax period shown on the CDP Notice if the taxpayer did not receive a statutory notice of deficiency for that tax liability or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute that tax liability. Finally, the taxpayer may not raise an issue that was raised and considered at a previous CDP hearing under section 6320 or in any other previous administrative or judicial proceeding if the taxpayer participated meaningfully in such hearing or proceeding. Taxpayers will be expected to provide 2Sec. 301.6320-1T(e)(1), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 64 Fed. Reg. 3402 (Jan. 22, 1999), is substantially similar to section 301.6330-1T(e)(1), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 64 Fed. Reg. 3411 (Jan. 22, 1999).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011