- 4 - repay it, the overpayment is, in effect, a loan to him that should not be included in his income. Generally, loan proceeds are not income to the borrower. Although we understand why petitioner might view the overpayment as a loan, for Federal income tax purposes, an overpayment of Social Security benefits is not treated as a loan to the recipient. An individual’s Social Security benefits are subject to reduction if the individual’s other income exceeds a certain level during a particular year. See 42 U.S.C. sec. 403. The extent of the reduction often cannot be determined until year’s end when the individual’s other income for the entire year is known. Similarly, the extent of an overpayment of Social Security benefits resulting from such a reduction often cannot be determined until year’s end. Under those circumstances, an overpayment of Social Security benefits made in one year would have to be recovered in subsequent years. See 42 U.S.C. sec. 404. The legislative history accompanying section 86(d) indicates that the Congress was mindful of the potential negative Federal income tax consequences facing a taxpayer in such a situation and in the enactment of section 86(d)(2) intended to provide a mechanism “to prevent a taxpayer from being subject to taxation on his benefits in those situations in which a taxpayer must repay a portion of those benefits because he has been overpaid previously.” S. Rept. 98-23 at 27 (1983), 1983-2 C.B. 326, 329.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011