Daniel V. Alfaro and Irma L. Alfaro - Page 5




                                         - 5 -                                          
          to petitioner’s law practice), under section 163(a) and (h), the              
          related $1,527,695 in interest paid on those tax liabilities is               
          likewise allocable to petitioner’s trade or business and should               
          be deductible.                                                                
               Petitioners cite Redlark v. Commissioner, 106 T.C. 31                    
          (1996), revd. and remanded 141 F.3d 936 (9th Cir. 1998), and                  
          Kikalos v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-92, revd. 190 F.3d 791               
          (7th Cir. 1999), and a body of presection 163(h) caselaw (see                 
          Reise v. Commissioner, 35 T.C. 571 (1961), affd. 299 F.2d 380                 
          (7th Cir. 1962), Polk v. Commissioner, 31 T.C. 412 (1958), affd.              
          276 F.2d 601 (10th Cir. 1960), and Standing v. Commissioner,                  
          28 T.C. 789 (1957), affd. 259 F.2d 450 (4th Cir. 1958)), in which             
          cases it was held that individual taxpayers were entitled to                  
          deduct interest on their Federal income tax liabilities relating              
          to income from a sole proprietorship business.                                
               After trial and the filing of briefs in this case, we                    
          decided Robinson v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 44 (2002), which also              
          involved the deductibility of interest paid by an individual                  
          taxpayer to respondent with respect to the taxpayer’s Federal                 
          income tax liability relating to income from the taxpayer’s law               
          practice.  In Robinson, we concluded that section 1.163-                      
          9T(b)(2)(i)(A), Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra, is valid, that             
          presection 163(h) caselaw was inapplicable, that we would no                  
          longer follow our opinion in Redlark v. Commissioner, 106 T.C. 31             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011