- 3 -
Whether petitioner is entitled to relief under section 6015(b)
for the years at issue; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to
relief under section 6015(c) for the years at issue; and (3)
whether respondent abused his discretion in denying petitioner
relief under section 6015(f) for the years at issue.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On August 13, 2001, respondent filed a Motion to Show Cause
Why Proposed Facts In Evidence Should Not Be Accepted As
Established under Rule 91(f). Respondent attached to his motion
a proposed stipulation of facts and exhibits. On August 14,
2001, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Under Rule 91(f),
requiring petitioner to respond as to why matters set forth in
respondent’s motion should not be deemed admitted. On November
1, 2001, the Court made absolute its Order to Show Cause Under
Rule 91(f), providing that the facts and evidence set forth in
respondent’s proposed stipulation of facts were deemed
established, and exhibits in the proposed stipulation of facts
were received into evidence and made a part of the record of the
case. The stipulation of facts, deemed admissions, and the
attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.
At the time she filed her petition, petitioner resided in
Douglas, Michigan, and had a mailing address in Holland,
Michigan.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011