Andantech L.L.C., Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. (f.k.a. Norwest Equipment Finance, Inc.), Tax Matters Partner, and Wells Fargo & Co., A Partner Other Than the Tax Matters Partner, et al. - Page 64




                                        - 45 -                                          
          that the value of the equipment in categories E through I was                 
          between $11,600,000 and $12,225,000.                                          
               The principal amounts of the balloon notes for categories E              
          through I (junior promissory notes 2e-2i) were:  $1,083,615;                  
          $699,454; $3,891,020; $2,313,841; and $7,933,856, respectively.               
          The aggregate principal amount was $15,921,786.  The notes bore               
          interest at 9 percent, compounded monthly.  The total liability on            
          the early termination date was $20,222,439.                                   
               Ms. Grossman and Mr. Vandermark discussed Comdisco’s exercise            
          of its early termination option, as well as Comdisco’s belief that            
          the value of the equipment in categories E through I was less than            
          the liability for principal and interest on the balloon notes.  Mr.           
          Vandermark was disconcerted to learn that there was a good chance             
          that RD Leasing would receive nothing for its position in the                 
          lease.  On May 30, 1996, Ms. Grossman engaged ARI Propertylink Co.            
          (ARI Propertylink) to appraise the 40 mainframe computers                     
          comprising the Andantech portfolio as of the early termination                
          dates.  Mary O’Connor (who had appraised the equipment in 1993) was           
          ARI Propertylink’s appraiser.                                                 
               On June 5, 1996, ARI Propertylink advised Ms. Grossman that              
          the value of the equipment was $13,465,000.  The appraisal stated             
          that the equipment had “eroded” in value more rapidly than had been           
          anticipated in 1993 because of:  (1) A change in IBM pricing                  
          strategy (i.e., increased discounting); (2) an increase in                    
          production of mainframes by IBM; (3) the introduction of new                  





Page:  Previous  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011