Steven M. and Karen Arhontes - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency of $10,973 in                       
          petitioners' Federal income tax for 1997 and an accuracy-related            
          penalty under section 6662(a) of $2,194.60.                                 
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioners are              
          entitled to reduce gross receipts by a cost of goods sold of                
          $38,897 in connection with a trade or business activity of Steven           
          M. Arhontes (petitioner) known as Spanky's Sports Cards                     
          (Spanky's); (2) whether petitioners are entitled to a deduction             
          for car and truck expenses of $275 in connection with Spanky's;             
          (3) whether petitioners are entitled to a $22 depreciation                  
          deduction in connection with Spanky's; and (4) whether                      
          petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related penalty under               
          section 6662(a) for negligence or disregard of rules or                     
          regulations in the amount of $2,194.60.  The remaining                      
          adjustments in the notice of deficiency to petitioners' itemized            
          deductions, self-employment taxes, and self-employment tax                  
          deduction are computational and will be resolved by the Court's             
          holdings on the aforementioned issues.                                      
               Some of the facts were stipulated, and those facts, with the           
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by               
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioners’                
          legal residence was Castro Valley, California.                              
               During the year at issue, petitioners were both employed by            
          Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) at San Francisco, California;                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011