- 9 - Summary of Determination It is Appeals determination that Collection is allowed to proceed with enforced collection actions. Attached to the notice of determination was a document entitled “ENCLOSURE TO NOTICE OF DETERMINATION”. That document stated in pertinent part: • All provisions of IRC � 6330 and IRC � 6320 have been met. The Secretary has provided sufficient verification that the requirements of applicable law or administrative procedures have been met. • Your request for a Collection Due Process Hearing was made under IRC � 6330 to prevent proposed collection action and to question the underlying assessment. You alleged that the assessment was invalid for various and sundry reasons, none of which addressed the actual tax liability. The returns were reviewed and it was found the taxes are based upon returns that you filed and thus the correctness of the assessed tax is not an issue. You did not respond to the correspondence sent you or to be available for a scheduled hearing. You did not advise Appeals of your inability to be available for the hearing or of a better time to hold the hearing. You did not respond to an at- tempt to reschedule the hearing. You refused to provide any financial information, including the financial information necessary to make a determi- nation of least intrusive and alternative means of collection. Therefore: • It is Appeals determination that the proposed collection action balances the need for efficient collection of taxes with the taxpayer’s legitimate concern that any collection action be no more intrusive than necessary because of the lack of financial information to explore alternative col- lection resolutions and your failure to be avail- able for the Collection Due Process Hearing. As of the time of the trial in the instant case, petitioner and Mr. Armstrong had not filed an amended tax return for taxablePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011