Asa Investerings Partnership, Alliedsignal, Inc., Tax Matters Partner - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-305, affd. 201 F.3d 505                  
               (D.C. Cir. 2000).  Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to                  
               redetermine interest in this case.                                     
               Jerome Bernard Libin, Steuart Hill Thomsen, David A. Roby              
          Jr., Robert S. Chase II, William Sanford Corey, Alexa Temple                
          Dubert, H. Karl Zeswitz Jr., and Joseph M. Persinger, for                   
          petitioner.                                                                 
               Jill A. Frisch, for respondent.                                        


                                       OPINION                                        
               RUWE, Judge:  On October 3, 2001, petitioner, AlliedSignal,            
          Inc., filed a motion to redetermine interest under section                  
          7481(c) and Rule 261.1  Petitioner claims to have overpaid                  
          deficiency interest in the following amounts and for the                    
          following tax years:                                                        
                    Tax Year                 Interest                                 
                    1988                     $415,714                                 
                    1989                         2,658,117                            
          1990                        17,564,033                                      
          1991                             0                                          
          1992                         3,743,091                                      
          1993                           178,469                                      
          1994                         1,766,896                                      
          1995                         6,347,788                                      
          Respondent filed a notice of objection in which he moves to                 
          dismiss petitioner’s motion for lack of jurisdiction.  Respondent           
          argues that we lack jurisdiction to redetermine petitioner’s                



               1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect at the time of the filing of the motion, and all Rule                
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011