- 2 - After a concession by petitioners,1 the remaining issues in this case are: (1) Whether wage income received by petitioners in the amount of $87,118.92 in 1996, except for wages of $432.48 from Defense Finance and Accounting Service, an agency of the Federal Government, is nontaxable, thereby resulting in an overpayment of income tax for the taxable year; (2) whether petitioners are entitled to Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, in excess of the amounts which respondent allowed; (3) whether petitioners are entitled to various Schedule C, Profit and Loss From Business, deductions beyond that which respondent allowed; and (4) whether petitioners are liable for an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. At the time the petition was filed, Sarah A. Bland-Barclay resided in Baltimore, 1 Petitioners conceded in the Stipulation of Facts that petitioner Sarah A. Barclay received a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement for 1996, from Olsten Home Healthcare, Inc. (Olsten), reporting that she received $1,268.81 of wage income. We note that in the notice of deficiency respondent determined that petitioners failed to include wage income of $1,267. The record does not explain the $1.81 discrepancy between the amount on the Olsten Form W-2 and the notice of deficiency. We accept respondent’s assertion that the amount in dispute is $1,267 as stipulated by petitioners and determined in the notice of deficiency.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011