Rodney J. and Noreen E. Blonien - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          start a modest branch office of Finley Kumble in Sacramento,                
          California.  Mr. Blonien continued to have conversations with               
          Governor Carey about opening a Finley Kumble branch office in               
          Sacramento.                                                                 
               In March 1987, Mr. Blonien reached an oral agreement to join           
          Finley Kumble as a partner.  Under the terms of the agreement,              
          Mr. Blonien was to receive a draw of $8,750 per month and was to            
          make a capital contribution to Finley Kumble of $80,000.  Finley            
          Kumble agreed to arrange for Mr. Blonien to borrow the funds to             
          make the capital contribution from its lender, Manufacturers                
          Hanover Bank.2                                                              
               On April 1, 1987, Mr. Blonien left the California State                
          government to begin practicing law with Finley Kumble in                    
          Sacramento.  Acting on behalf of Finley Kumble, Mr. Blonien                 
          sublet office space from another law firm, obtained office                  

               2The terms of the offer are set forth in a letter to Mr.               
          Blonien dated Mar. 4, 1987, from Steven Kumble, Harvey Myerson,             
          Robert Washington, and Governor Carey.  Mr. Blonien testified               
          that he did not receive this letter until after Sept. 2, 1987.              
          Mr. Blonien testified that Governor Carey orally informed him of            
          these same basic terms in March 1987, but that he did not receive           
          written confirmation of the terms until September 1987.                     
          Respondent argues that Mr. Blonien’s testimony is self-serving,             
          and that it is incredible that Mr. Blonien would leave his                  
          government job without written confirmation of Finley Kumble’s              
          offer.  It does not matter in the case at hand whether the offer            
          and acceptance were oral or written, and we therefore need not              
          decide when Mr. Blonien first received written confirmation of              
          the terms of the partnership offer.  Mr. Blonien testified that             
          he assumed, when he started working for Finley Kumble, that his             
          relationship with the firm would be as described in the letter              
          dated Mar. 4, 1987.                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011