Karen Boyd - Page 8




                                                - 8 -                                                  
            Target showing a Sony CFD530 for $139.99.  Petitioner testified                            
            that the receipt represents the purchase of a Sony facsimile                               
            machine.  Petitioner also offered a receipt from Sonia Reyes, of                           
            the law firm Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, in downtown Los                                  
            Angeles, showing the purchase of a Hewlett Packard Laser Jet                               
            Series II laser printer for $750, and two receipts from Superbyte                          
            Inc., showing the purchase of two computers for $1,045 and                                 
            $1,550, respectively.                                                                      
                  We find that petitioner substantiated the purchase of the                            
            above items for the use in her consulting business.  Accordingly,                          
            petitioner is entitled to a depreciation deduction premised on                             
            cost bases of $139.99 for the fax machine, of $750 for the                                 
            printer, and of $2,595 for the computers.  All items are 5-year                            
            property as defined under section 168(e)(3)(B) and are subject to                          
            the midquarter convention under section 168(d)(3)(A).                                      
                  Petitioner failed to provide any evidence for the claimed                            
            repairs/maintenance deduction and other deduction.  Petitioner’s                           
            Schedule C itemizes the other expenses of $4,000 to include bank                           
            charges of $600, educational seminars of $750, and telephone of                            
            $2,650.  However, petitioner is deemed to have conceded these                              
            items because she failed to offer any evidence to support these                            
            amounts.  Rules 142(a), 149; Pearson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                           
            2000-160.                                                                                  
                  The last issue for decision is whether petitioner is liable                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011