Rodney L. Burr - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          any part of the tax paid on or before the date prescribed for               
          payment and by the amount of any credit against tax which may be            
          claimed on the return.  Sec. 6651(b)(1).  The addition to tax for           
          failure to file a timely return does not apply where the taxpayer           
          shows that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to           
          willful neglect.  Sec. 6651(a)(1).                                          
               The addition to tax for failure to pay timely is 0.5 percent           
          of the amount shown as tax on the return for each month, or                 
          fraction thereof, during which the failure to pay continues, up             
          to a maximum of 25 percent.  Sec. 6651(a)(2).  Under section                
          6651(g)(2), a substitute return prepared by the Commissioner                
          under section 6020(b) is treated as a return filed by the                   
          taxpayer for returns due after July 30, 1996 (determined without            
          regard to extensions).  See Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L.              
          104-168, sec. 1301(b), 110 Stat. 1475; Smith v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 2000-290; sec. 301.6651-1(g), Proced. & Admin. Regs.             
          Respondent’s determination that petitioner is liable for the                
          addition with respect to his 1995 tax year, the return for which            
          was due before July 30, 1996, is not based on an amount shown as            
          tax on a return filed by petitioner.  Petitioner did not file a             
          return prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency for                
          1995.4  See Heisey v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-41.                     

               4Respondent has not argued that the delinquent return filed            
          by petitioner with respect to 1995 constitutes a return for                 
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011