William T. Butler, Transferee - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
               In 1991, the State of Minnesota audited Metro.  McGraw did             
          not disclose to the State auditor, and the auditor did not                  
          discover, the income omissions or fictitious expenses.  Metro was           
          dissolved on December 11, 1991.                                             
               In 1995, David Kraemer discovered that Miller had received             
          kickbacks from Metro and filed suit, on behalf of Kraemer & Sons,           
          against Wybierala and Butler for unpaid dumping fees.                       
               On June 28, 1995, Butler pled guilty to violating section              
          7206(2) relating to Metro’s 1988 return (i.e., aiding and                   
          abetting the filing of a false corporate return), and section               
          7206(1) relating to his 1988 individual return (i.e., filing a              
          false personal income tax return).  Butler admitted knowing that            
          Metro’s 1988 return did not include all of Metro’s taxable income           
          and agreed to pay $1.5 million toward his individual, and                   
          Metro’s, tax liabilities.  In 1997, Miller pled guilty to                   
          violating section 7201 for failing to report cash received from             
          Butler (i.e., presenting a false or fraudulent return).                     
               On November 30, 1999, respondent issued petitioners notices            
          of liability in which respondent determined that petitioners, as            
          transferees of Metro, are liable for $1,946,292.38 of corporate             




               2(...continued)                                                        
          exchange, the mean price between the * * * [high and low] trading           
          prices on a given date is * * * the fair market value for that              
          date.”), revd. on other grounds 383 F.2d 883 (8th Cir. 1967).               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011