- 10 - The legal fees paid by Capital Video in its taxable year ending February 29, 1996 ($343,971), and in its short taxable year ending December 31, 1996 ($423,101), to defend Guarino against the conspiracy charge are not deductible as business expenses of Capital Video. Constructive Dividend to Guarino A constructive dividend to a shareholder of a corporation may occur where the corporation “confers an economic benefit on * * * [the] shareholder without the expectation of repayment * * * even though neither the corporation nor the shareholder intended a dividend.” Magnon v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 980, 993-994 (1980). Not every payment by a corporation, however, which incidentally confers an economic benefit on a shareholder is treated as a constructive dividend. Hood v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 172 (2000). Generally, the test of whether a payment is to be treated as a constructive dividend to a shareholder is whether the payment primarily benefited the shareholder and whether the payment was made for a valid business purpose of the corporation. Loftin & Woodard, Inc. v. United States, 577 F.2d 1206, 1214 (5th Cir. 1978). As we have held, petitioners have not established that Capital Video made the payments of Guarino’s legal fees in connection with the business of Capital Video. Capital Video had no obligation to make such payments. The payment by CapitalPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011