- 9 - (2) The expertise of the taxpayer or his advisers; (3) The time and effort expended by the taxpayer in carrying on the activity; (4) Expectation that assets used in activity may appreciate in value; (5) The success of the taxpayer in carrying on other similar or dissimilar activities; (6) The taxpayer’s history of income or losses with respect to the activity; (7) The amount of occasional profits; (8) The financial status of the taxpayer; (9) Elements of personal pleasure or recreation. Petitioner bears the burden of proof with respect to this determination. Golanty v. Commissioner, supra at 426; McCarthy v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-135.7 Petitioners argue that Mr. Carino was engaged in the alleged management activity for profit and cite numerous factors as evidence thereof: He maintained a logbook of expenses; he used a separate checking account while in Atlanta; he was an experienced attorney in a successful personal injury litigation practice who took courses in entertainment and sports law and accumulated books and treatises on that subject; he consulted with purported experts in the field; he spent considerable time and effort in the activity to the extent that his law practice suffered; and he 7Petitioners do not argue the applicability of sec. 7491(a), and the record does not reflect that sec. 7491(a) applies.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011