Virgil Cato - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         
          substantiate his claims.  Respondent has claimed an increased               
          deficiency in his answer alleging that petitioner is not entitled           
          to a dependency exemption deduction or a child tax credit for his           
          daughter.                                                                   
                                     Discussion                                       
          1.  Dependency Exemption Deductions2                                        
               Section 151(c) allows a taxpayer to deduct an exemption                
          amount for each "dependent" as defined in section 152.  Section             
          152(a) defines a dependent to include a son or daughter of the              
          taxpayer, “over half of whose support, for the calendar year in             
          which the taxable year of the taxpayer begins, was received from            
          the taxpayer (or is treated under subsection (c) or (e) as                  
          received from the taxpayer)”.                                               
               In the case of a child of divorced parents, section                    
          152(e)(1) provides that if a child receives over half of his                
          support from parents who are divorced under a decree of divorce             
          and the child is in the custody of one or both of his parents for           
          more than one-half of the year, then the child will be treated as           
          receiving over half of his support from the parent having custody           
          for a greater portion of the calendar year.  Section 1.152-4(b),            
          Income Tax Regs., provides that the term "custody" is "determined           
          by the terms of the most recent decree of divorce".  Because the            


               2 The Court decides this case without regard to the burden             
          of proof.  Accordingly, the Court need not decide whether current           
          sec. 7491(a)(1) is applicable in this case.  See Higbee v.                  
          Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438 (2001).                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011