Karen Ann Cicchini - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
              Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal              
         income tax for 1998 in the amount of $2,134.                                 
              After a concession by respondent,2 the issues for decision              
         are as follows:                                                              
              (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to deductions for                    
         dependency exemptions for her two sons.  We hold that she is.                
              (2) Whether petitioner is entitled to a child tax credit in             
         respect of her two sons.  We hold that she is.                               
         Background                                                                   
              Many of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so                 
         found.                                                                       
              At the time that the petition was filed, petitioner resided             
         in Santa Maria, California.                                                  
              A.  Petitioner’s Marriage and Children                                  
              In May 1980, petitioner and Dean William Anker (Mr. Anker)              
         were married in West Point, New York.  The couple had two sons:              
         Francis Gregory Anker, who was born in June 1982, and Daniel                 
         Thomas Anker, who was born in January 1984 (collectively, the                
         children or petitioner’s sons).                                              
              B.  Petitioner’s Divorce                                                
              In or about 1984, petitioner and Mr. Anker experienced                  
         marital discord, and divorce proceedings were commenced.  Both               



               2 Respondent concedes that petitioner’s filing status for              
          1998 is head-of-household.                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011