Shade D. Coleman III and Maria M. Coleman - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          notice and demand for payment, the Secretary is authorized to               
          collect such tax by levy on the person’s property.  Section                 
          6331(d) provides that at least 30 days before enforcing                     
          collection by levy on the person’s property, the Secretary is               
          obliged to provide the person with a final notice of intent to              
          levy, including notice of the administrative appeals available to           
          the person.                                                                 
               Section 6330 generally provides that the Commissioner cannot           
          proceed with collection by levy until the person has been given             
          notice and the opportunity for an administrative review of the              
          matter (in the form of an Appeals Office hearing) and, if                   
          dissatisfied, with judicial review of the administrative                    
          determination.  See Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 37                  
          (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 179 (2000).                     
               Section 6330(c) prescribes the matters that a person may               
          raise at an Appeals Office hearing.  In sum, section 6330(c)                
          provides that a person may raise collection issues such as                  
          spousal defenses, the appropriateness of the Commissioner’s                 
          intended collection action, and possible alternative means of               
          collection.  Section 6330(c)(2)(B) provides that the existence              
          and amount of the underlying tax liability can be contested at an           
          Appeals Office hearing if the person did not receive a notice of            
          deficiency for the taxes in question or did not otherwise have an           
          earlier opportunity to dispute the tax liability.  See Sego v.              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011