- 7 - for 1994 until October 31, 2000. Respondent issued the notice of deficiency to petitioners on April 24, 2000. OPINION A. Whether Petitioners May Exclude From Gross Income Under Section 104(a)(2) $59,163 That Petitioner Received in 1994 Petitioners contend that the $59,163 that petitioner received from Xircom in 1994 is excludable from gross income as damages for a personal injury under section 104(a)(2).3 Petitioners contend that Xircom and AT&T colluded to prevent petitioner from being employed by either of them. Petitioners contend that, because of petitioner’s job situation, they became physically ill, lost sleep, suffered emotional distress, and were divorced, and that the payments were on account of those personal injuries.4 3 Sec. 104(a)(2) provides: SEC. 104(a). In General.--Except in the case of amounts attributable to (and not in excess of) deductions allowed under section 213 (relating to medical, etc., expenses) for any prior taxable year, gross income does not include-- * * * * * * * (2) the amount of any damages received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal injuries or sickness; 4 For the year in issue, personal injuries included both physical and nonphysical injuries. Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323, 329 n.4 (1995).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011