Mark Christopher and Nancy Louise Corcoran - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          6673(a)(1).  All section references are to the Internal Revenue             
          Code in effect for 1998.                                                    
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioners’                 
          compensation for services, unemployment compensation, and                   
          interest received during 1998 constitute gross income; (2)                  
          whether petitioners are liable for an accuracy-related penalty              
          under section 6662(a); and (3) whether imposition of a penalty              
          under section 6673(a) is appropriate under the circumstances of             
          this case.                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the accompanying exhibits are                  
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioners resided in              
          Fallbrook, California, when they filed their petition.                      
               Petitioners are well-educated people.  Both graduated from             
          California State University at Long Beach.  Mark Corcoran                   
          (petitioner) received a bachelor’s degree in business                       
          administration with an emphasis in accounting.  Petitioner Nancy            
          Corcoran (Mrs. Corcoran) holds a master’s degree in education.              
          Petitioner is an accountant for Global Outdoors, Inc.  Mrs.                 
          Corcoran teaches in the San Diego Catholic school system.                   
               During 1998, petitioner received compensation for services             
          of $13,269 and $5,773 from All American Homes and Empire Marine,            
          Inc., respectively.  Petitioner also received unemployment                  
          compensation of $168 from the California Employment Development             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011