James Edward Crawford - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          jurisdiction to decide the issue.  Petitioner agreed to settle              
          his case.  On April 14, 1993, he signed a decision document                 
          agreeing to deficiencies of $6,330 for 1980 and $5,717 for 1983,            
          and to certain concessions as to additions to tax and an                    
          additional amount under section 6621(c).  The decision document             
          also states, consistent with the settlement computation of June             
          27, 1989, that petitioner has net tax payments of $5,717 for                
          1983.                                                                       
               On July 26, 1993, petitioner sent a check for $1,567.51 to             
          the IRS for his 1980 tax liability.  In response to a letter from           
          petitioner dated February 16, 1994, the Court wrote to him                  
          explaining that jurisdiction did not currently exist to recompute           
          the statutory interest to be assessed on his 1980 tax deficiency.           
          Petitioner alleged in his letter to the Court that the amount he            
          was now disputing was "the RE-PAYMENT of money the IRS sent me in           
          error, plus nine (9) years of compounded interest."                         
               In response to petitioner's correspondence to Commissioner             
          Michael P. Dolan, dated November 13, 1997, the Acting District              
          Taxpayer Advocate sent petitioner a letter dated January 7, 1998,           
          attempting to explain petitioner's transcripts of account for               
          1980 and 1983.                                                              
               On April 27, 1999, respondent received a Form 843, Claim for           
          Refund and Request for Abatement, filed by petitioner.  In an               
          attachment to the form, petitioner states that "The two sources             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011