- 11 -
Court finds to be frivolous and/or groundless.7
7Criss Trust’s response to the December 3, 2001 Show Cause
Order stated in pertinent part:
1. Petitioner petitioned this Court after having
received false and misleading information from the
respondent and attorneys David Wise and his asso-
ciate Carol Jackson. The respondent has failed to
properly assess any taxes in accordance with their
required administrative procedures, and yet ad-
vised the petitioner that the only method of dis-
agreeing with the purported tax liability was to
petition this Court.
* * * * * * *
3. This Courts’ [sic] order states “. . . petitioner
purports to be a trust . . .” Petitioner is a
trust, and the respondent has never been able to
prove otherwise. Nor does the respondent have the
right or ability to set aside a contract.
* * * * * * *
5. Petitioner does not want this false tax claim to
be litigated in court, and has petitioned this
Court to have this case removed from the docket as
having been petitioned in error due to the errone-
ous instructions given by the respondent.
WHEREFORE it is prayed that:
1. This Court dismiss this case at petitioner’s re-
quest as the original petition was issued in error
due to false directions given to petitioner by
respondent. Petitioner believes that he has the
right to correct his mistake and withdraw the
original petition.
2. This Court and the respondent recognize the peti-
tioner as a Trust and cease attempting to set
aside a contract in direct opposition to the Con-
stitution of the United States of America.
3. This court sanction the respondent for using this
(continued...)
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011