Richard B. Crow - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          issues for decision are:  (1) Whether a distribution of                     
          $39,295.08 from an individual retirement account is includable in           
          petitioner’s gross income for 1998; and (2) whether petitioner is           
          liable for the accuracy-related penalty pursuant to section                 
          6662(a) due to a substantial understatement of income tax.                  
          Background                                                                  
               The parties submitted this case fully stipulated pursuant to           
          Rule 122.2  The stipulation of facts, the supplemental                      
          stipulation of facts, and the attached exhibits are incorporated            
          herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in Kenosha,                   
          Wisconsin, at the time he filed his petition.                               
               Petitioner has maintained individual retirement accounts               
          (IRAs) at TCF National Bank (the bank), formerly known as                   
          Republic Savings.  On July 23, 1976, petitioner established an              
          IRA, account number 0400014416, with the bank.  During the period           
          July 23, 1976, through August 28, 1998, periodic payments were              
          made to this IRA.  Petitioner received annual statements                    
          indicating the value of all his IRAs.                                       
               On August 28, 1998, petitioner met with Maria Koble (Ms.               
          Koble), a representative from the bank, to discuss petitioner’s             



               2We note that although this case was submitted fully                   
          stipulated, that does not alter the burden of proof, or the                 
          requirements otherwise applicable with respect to adducing proof,           
          or the effect of failure of proof.  Rule 122(b); Kitch v.                   
          Commissioner, 104 T.C. 1, 5 (1995), affd. 103 F.3d 104 (10th Cir.           
          1996).                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011