- 7 - we agree with respondent.6 On that record, we find that respon- dent has satisfied respondent’s burden of production under section 7491(c) with respect to the additions to tax at issue in these cases. Petitioners have the burden of establishing that they are not liable for those additions to tax. See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446-447 (2001). Mr. Dimon testified that he did not file a return for 1996 because some unidentified person advised him that the $127,970 that he received during 1996 represented proceeds from the sale of a business, and not earned income. We shall not rely on Mr. Dimon’s general, conclusory, and uncorroborated testimony as to the reasons why he did not file a return for 1996 or pay estimated tax for that year. On the record before us, we find that petitioners have failed to show that they are not liable for the additions to tax under sections 6651(a)(1) and 6654 that respondent determined in the respective notices issued to them. We have considered all of the contentions and arguments of petitioners that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit and/or irrelevant. To reflect the foregoing, Decisions will be entered under Rule 155. 6The record establishes that neither Ms. Dimon nor Mr. Dimon filed a return for taxable year 1996 and that neither of them made any estimated or other tax payments for that year except for $94 which was withheld from Ms. Dimon’s wages.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: May 25, 2011