- 5 - to January 2002. The following transactions had invoice dates in 1998: Payment Method of payment Invoice date Payment date $50.00 Check 9/11/1998 9/10/1998 45.00 Check 9/11/1998 9/10/1998 80.27 Check 9/23/1998 9/23/1998 1,038.00 EFT1 9/30/1998 1/25/1999 86.20 Check 11/10/1998 11/10/1998 1,038.00 EFT 11/11/1998 1/25/1999 Petitioner made four payments to the University of Phoenix in 1998 totaling $261.47. Petitioner also made two payments to the University of Phoenix in 1999 for expenses that were incurred in 1998. The latter two expenses cannot be treated as qualified higher education expenses for 1998. Petitioner, as a cash method taxpayer, is not entitled to accrue expenses. Under the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting “Expenditures are to be deducted for the taxable year in which actually made”. Sec. 1.446-1(c)(1)(i), Income Tax Regs.; see secs. 446, 461; sec. 1.461-1(a)(1), Income Tax Regs. Petitioner’s higher education expenses for 1998 are limited to the qualified higher education expenses that she actually paid during 1998. Accordingly, only $261.47 of petitioner’s payments to the University of Phoenix qualify as qualified higher education expenses for 1998. Petitioner mentioned that her daughter was a student. But petitioner provided no information to indicate the amount of any expenses she may have incurred for the education of her daughter 1 Electronic funds transfer.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011