Roy and Margaret Eliason - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
               We hold that respondent’s Appeals Office did not abuse its             
          discretion, and respondent may proceed with the proposed                    
          collection by way of levy.                                                  


                                             Decision will be entered for             
                                        respondent.                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

Last modified: May 25, 2011