Juan El Khouri and Kitty Hunter - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          showing that they mailed a petition to the Court on September 15,           
          2001, and, if available, a copy of U.S. Postal Service Form 3800,           
          Certified Mail Receipt, for certified mail item No. 7001 0360               
          0001 7533 5423.  Petitioners did not respond to this Order.                 
               This matter was called for hearing at the Court’s motions              
          session held in Washington, D.C., on March 27, 2002.  Counsel for           
          respondent appeared at the hearing and offered argument in                  
          support of respondent’s motion to dismiss.  There was no                    
          appearance by or on behalf of petitioners at the hearing, nor did           
          petitioners file any statement pursuant to Rule 50(c), the                  
          applicability of which was brought to their attention by the                
          Court in its Order calendaring respondent’s motion for hearing.             
               Following the hearing, the Court directed respondent to file           
          a supplement to his motion to dismiss addressing the question               
          whether section 7508A, or any public notices issued pursuant to             
          that section after September 11, 2001, would provide relief to              
          petitioners with regard to the timeliness of their petition.                
          Respondent complied with the Court’s Order and filed a supplement           
          to his motion, asserting that petitioners are not eligible for              
          relief under section 7508A with regard to the petition filed in             
          this case.                                                                  
               This matter was called for further hearing at the Court’s              
          motions session held in Washington, D.C., on May 8, 2002.                   
          Counsel for respondent appeared at the hearing and offered                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011