- 10 - entire $250,689 (rounded) which Farmers paid from the “contract value” directly to Gloria Farnsworth during 1995 and 1996, and an additional $122,871 in alleged basis, leaving a reported gross profit of $388,180. Petitioners reported on Form 6252 receiving $516,397 in “contract value” payments in 1995, consisting of: (1) $323,560 of “contract value” received by Mr. Farnsworth; (2) $167,126 of “contract value” received by Gloria Farnsworth; (3) the canceled credit union loan of $20,514 (which was apparently repaid by Farmers out of the contract value); and (4) the $5,197 Fred Fourby loan guaranty (which was apparently also repaid or withheld by Farmers). Using Mr. Farnsworth’s and Gloria Farnsworth’s relative shares of total contract receipts, petitioners reported a gross profit percentage of 50.96 on Form 6252. For 1995, on the basis of total payments reportedly received by Mr. Farnsworth and Gloria Farnsworth of $516,397, petitioners reported taxable installment sale income for the year of $263,156 (50.96 percent x $516,397 = $263,156). Respondent's notice of deficiency disallowed the reduction from “contract value” for the payments made by Farmers directly to Gloria Farnsworth, disallowed the reduction of Mr. Farnsworth’s claimed recovery of basis in the DMAA, andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011