- 4 - Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. __, __ (2002) (slip op. at 5). Testimony that expresses a legal conclusion and does not assist the Court is not admissible. Alumax Inc. v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. 133, 171 (1997), affd. 165 F.3d 822 (11th Cir. 1999); Hosp. Corp. of Am. v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. 21, 59 (1997); Laureys v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 101, 126-129 (1989). Additionally, an expert who is merely an advocate of a party’s position does not assist the Court to understand the issue. Sunoco, Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, supra at __ (slip op. at 6); Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 16, 20 (1995), affd. 98 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 1996); Laureys v. Commissioner, supra at 129. After reviewing Mr. Wilson’s report, we find that the report states legal conclusions and that these legal conclusions do not assist the Court in understanding the evidence or determining a fact in issue. This Court is capable of determining whether the tariff constitutes a “written supply or service contract” based on the relevant statutes, case law, and facts, and Mr. Wilson’s “opinion” in this regard would be of no assistance. Such matters are more appropriately argued on brief. Accordingly, we shallPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011