Estate of James G. Frazier, Deceased, James G. Frazier Jr., Executor - Page 11




                                       - 11 -                                         
          the leased premises, regardless of whether the tenant placed the            
          fixtures there at his own expense.  Cal. Civ. Code sec. 1013                
          (West 1982).7  Where fixtures are placed on leased premises for             
          the purposes of trade (trade fixtures), however, a tenant has a             
          limited right to remove those fixtures.  We look to California              
          Code section 1019 to define removable trade fixtures because the            
          lease failed to provide a definition.8  Realty Dock & Improv.               
          Corp. v. Anderson, 174 Cal. 672, 676 (1917).  Whether the                   
          improvements are removable trade fixtures within the meaning of             
          the law is a question of fact.  Borchers Bros. Co. v. Ciaparro,             
          211 Cal. 507, 511 (1931).  The definition of a removable trade              
          fixture is codified in California Code section 1019 which                   
          provides:                                                                   
                    A tenant may remove from the demised premises, any                
               time during the continuance of his term, anything                      
               affixed thereto for purposes of trade, manufacture,                    
               ornament, or domestic use, if the removal can be                       
               effected without injury to the premises, unless the                    


               7  California Civil Code sec. 1013 provides:                           
                    When a person affixes his property to the land of                 
               another, without an agreement permitting him to remove                 
               it, the thing affixed, except as otherwise provided in                 
               this chapter, belongs to the owner of the land, unless                 
               he chooses to require the former to remove it or the                   
               former elects to exercise the right of removal provided                
               for in Section 1013.5 of this chapter.                                 
               8  California law allows parties to classify their property            
          between themselves, and the law will respect such agreements.               
          Md. Cas. Co. v. Knight, 96 F.3d 1284, 1291 (9th Cir. 1996)                  
          (citing Goldie v. Bauchet Props., 15 Cal. 3d 307, 313 (1975)).              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011